EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CAVITY LINING MATERIALS ON MARGINAL SEALING OF PACKABLE COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS- AN IN VITRO STUDY.

Authors

  • Dayanand Chole Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Dental College, 19/1, Kegaon, Solapur.
  • Preeti Vaprani Postgraduate student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Dental College, 19/1, Kegaon, Solapur.
  • Priyanka Bawa Senior lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Dental College, 19/1, Kegaon, Solapur.
  • Neha Gandhi Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Dental College, 19/1, Kegaon, Solapur.
  • Nikhil Hatte Senior lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Dental College, 19/1, Kegaon, Solapur.
  • Shriniwas Bakle Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Dental College, 19/1, Kegaon, Solapur.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmsdr.v4i10.677

Keywords:

Compomer, flowable composite, light-curing glass ionomer cement, microleakage, packable

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

“AIM: To assess the effect of three lining materials; flowable composite, flowable compomer, and light-curing glass ionomer cement (LCGIC) on microleakage in Class V restoration using packable composite restorations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized class V cavity was prepared on buccal surface of 40 young premolar teeth with the cervical margin extending 0.5 mm below the cementoenamel junction, into the dentin. All the samples were randomly divided into 4 groups according to the lining material used: Group I- Control; Group II- flowable composite; Group III- LCGIC and Group IV- flowable compomer. The restored teeth were thermocycled and immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. Each tooth was then sectioned along buccolingual direction. The dye penetration of the occlusal and gingival margins of each section was evaluated by a single observer using a stereomicroscope and statistically analyzed using Kruskal Walis Test and Mann-Whitney U Test.

RESULT: Maximum dye penetration score for Group 1, Group 2 was 3 and Group 3, Group 4 was 1. (p<0.05)

CONCLUSION: Flowable compomer and light cure glass ionomer cement as intermediate lining material can reduce microleakage under packable composite.

Keywords: Compomer, flowable composite, light-curing glass ionomer cement, microleakage, packable composite.”

Downloads

Published

2020-10-07

How to Cite

Chole, D. ., Vaprani, P., Bawa, P. ., Gandhi, N., Hatte, N., & Bakle, S. . (2020). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CAVITY LINING MATERIALS ON MARGINAL SEALING OF PACKABLE COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS- AN IN VITRO STUDY. International Journal of Medical Science And Diagnosis Research, 4(10). https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmsdr.v4i10.677

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 10 (2020)

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)